<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The long way round...</title>
	<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve</link>
	<description>Stuff you pick up on the way...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting up NUnit by Valtrex.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/09/19/setting-up-nunit/#comment-8118</link>
		<author>Valtrex.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/09/19/setting-up-nunit/#comment-8118</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Valtrex....&lt;/strong&gt;

Valtrex. Acyclovir versus valtrex. Valtrex and drug saftey. Valtrex medication. Generic valtrex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Valtrex&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Valtrex. Acyclovir versus valtrex. Valtrex and drug saftey. Valtrex medication. Generic valtrex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accidental Reflective Improvement by Side effects of valtrex.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/07/29/accidental-reflective-improvement/#comment-8021</link>
		<author>Side effects of valtrex.</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/07/29/accidental-reflective-improvement/#comment-8021</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Valtrex....&lt;/strong&gt;

Which is better valtrex famvir. Valtrex and weight loss. Valtrex. Coupon valtrex. Valtrex and strattera....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Valtrex&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Which is better valtrex famvir. Valtrex and weight loss. Valtrex. Coupon valtrex. Valtrex and strattera&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil in the engine mate, oil in the engine&#8230; by Valtrex.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-7949</link>
		<author>Valtrex.</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Valtrex....&lt;/strong&gt;

Valtrex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Valtrex&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Valtrex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live Blog Post by adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/09/04/windows-live-blog-post/#comment-151</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/09/04/windows-live-blog-post/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>http://blogs.cognifide.com/adam/

The link in the article is slightly misspelled
:)

BTW. I really like your new blog theme.

As to better blog editors - I am yet to find one. And frankly... Why would I look for one. It has spell checking and pretty much all that covers a casual blogging that we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.cognifide.com/adam/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cognifide.com/adam/</a></p>
<p>The link in the article is slightly misspelled<br />
 <img src='http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW. I really like your new blog theme.</p>
<p>As to better blog editors - I am yet to find one. And frankly&#8230; Why would I look for one. It has spell checking and pretty much all that covers a casual blogging that we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C++ is fast, Java is slow&#8230; by adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-56</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Java will still compile the byte code to machine language after a few thousands of iteration, which may be the case in many situation like the one you encountered.

I don't find synthetic tests like that to be too reliable, it's why we no longer use much of Dhrystones and Whetstones or MIPS to  measure the speed of a computer.

My experience is just that java belongs to server just fine, servers don't tend to use the parts of the framework which I was refering to they run their process for an extended period of time. 

Desktop apps however tend to be restarted after much shorter periods of time which does not allow java to benefit from the after-number-of-iterations-compilation all that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java will still compile the byte code to machine language after a few thousands of iteration, which may be the case in many situation like the one you encountered.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find synthetic tests like that to be too reliable, it&#8217;s why we no longer use much of Dhrystones and Whetstones or MIPS to  measure the speed of a computer.</p>
<p>My experience is just that java belongs to server just fine, servers don&#8217;t tend to use the parts of the framework which I was refering to they run their process for an extended period of time. </p>
<p>Desktop apps however tend to be restarted after much shorter periods of time which does not allow java to benefit from the after-number-of-iterations-compilation all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil in the engine mate, oil in the engine&#8230; by cleve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-55</link>
		<author>cleve</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I think you've taken this a little too literally.  It is not suggesting a hierachy of mega power.  Maybe the metaphor needs work, maybe?   But to take it even further, all engine parts come lubricated off the shelf.  The team is a team is a team, but some have more time to oil than others that's all.  As you say, everyone oils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve taken this a little too literally.  It is not suggesting a hierachy of mega power.  Maybe the metaphor needs work, maybe?   But to take it even further, all engine parts come lubricated off the shelf.  The team is a team is a team, but some have more time to oil than others that&#8217;s all.  As you say, everyone oils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil in the engine mate, oil in the engine&#8230; by Merlyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-54</link>
		<author>Merlyn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/26/oil-in-the-engine-mate-oil-in-the-engine/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I'm a developer, not a lead, but I subscribe 100% to the notion of 'kai zen' which to me means actively looking for small changes to improve the way I and the team work. It really doesn't take up much of my day, I feel more satified with my work, and every now and again I make a change that it's seriously appreciated.

I think it would be unhealthy for people to see themselves as being purely "part of the engine". There's got to be some oil in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a developer, not a lead, but I subscribe 100% to the notion of &#8216;kai zen&#8217; which to me means actively looking for small changes to improve the way I and the team work. It really doesn&#8217;t take up much of my day, I feel more satified with my work, and every now and again I make a change that it&#8217;s seriously appreciated.</p>
<p>I think it would be unhealthy for people to see themselves as being purely &#8220;part of the engine&#8221;. There&#8217;s got to be some oil in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C++ is fast, Java is slow&#8230; by Merlyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-53</link>
		<author>Merlyn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I have always assumed that Java is slower than C++. I got an insight into how much slower a year or so ago. I had an AI assignment to complete which required 5 million iterations of an activitation propergation algorithm. My lab mate laughed when I suggested writing it in Java. He wrote it in C. I timed his code, dropped it into Java with only syntactic modification, ran it and compared the results.

Turns out Java was only 2% slower.

My experience with Ruby (which I *love*) is that it's significantly slower than Java. I've got no figures to support this though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always assumed that Java is slower than C++. I got an insight into how much slower a year or so ago. I had an AI assignment to complete which required 5 million iterations of an activitation propergation algorithm. My lab mate laughed when I suggested writing it in Java. He wrote it in C. I timed his code, dropped it into Java with only syntactic modification, ran it and compared the results.</p>
<p>Turns out Java was only 2% slower.</p>
<p>My experience with Ruby (which I *love*) is that it&#8217;s significantly slower than Java. I&#8217;ve got no figures to support this though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C++ is fast, Java is slow&#8230; by adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-52</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/08/29/c-is-fast-java-is-slow/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I think it's not completely unjustified. I've done some job in Java and my conclusion was similar, but I think I can justify it to a degree. 

People blame Java for Swing.

And although the code speed generally relies heavily on the used algorithms and structures (and I have to admit the java code is usually well written in those terms), one cannot deny that Java is a byte-code running in a virtual environment which inevitably applies speed penalty. Garbage collector although making it simpler to manage memory adds to the penalty as well.

While .Net is not all that much better since it has a great number of similar concepts, although I like to think MS has taken the lesson from Swing's inability to not annoy users and the .Net MSIL is pre-compiled on every execution ans it uses a lot of hardware support in terms of internal P-invokes and using native API's for many tasks. Although the compilation may be causing a delay on the application startup, it however is resulting in a faster execution and apps generally appearing peppier than their Java counterparts.

Saying that Java is slow is a mistake, it has its appliances, I just don't find it a best language for Desktop applications, probably not because of its speed as a languabe but mostly because of the framework's way of doing the GUI and its strong separation from the host OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s not completely unjustified. I&#8217;ve done some job in Java and my conclusion was similar, but I think I can justify it to a degree. </p>
<p>People blame Java for Swing.</p>
<p>And although the code speed generally relies heavily on the used algorithms and structures (and I have to admit the java code is usually well written in those terms), one cannot deny that Java is a byte-code running in a virtual environment which inevitably applies speed penalty. Garbage collector although making it simpler to manage memory adds to the penalty as well.</p>
<p>While .Net is not all that much better since it has a great number of similar concepts, although I like to think MS has taken the lesson from Swing&#8217;s inability to not annoy users and the .Net MSIL is pre-compiled on every execution ans it uses a lot of hardware support in terms of internal P-invokes and using native API&#8217;s for many tasks. Although the compilation may be causing a delay on the application startup, it however is resulting in a faster execution and apps generally appearing peppier than their Java counterparts.</p>
<p>Saying that Java is slow is a mistake, it has its appliances, I just don&#8217;t find it a best language for Desktop applications, probably not because of its speed as a languabe but mostly because of the framework&#8217;s way of doing the GUI and its strong separation from the host OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let me go Intellij, let me go&#8230; by Greg Gigon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/06/23/let-me-go-intellij-let-me-go/#comment-51</link>
		<author>Greg Gigon</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/2006/06/23/let-me-go-intellij-let-me-go/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hm ...
I'm not a Eclipse maniac, but how about this http://www.googlipse.com/ .
Maybe you'r change your mind again Cleve.

Greg

Ps. Damn those Eclipse Gigs :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm &#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m not a Eclipse maniac, but how about this <a href="http://www.googlipse.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.googlipse.com/</a> .<br />
Maybe you&#8217;r change your mind again Cleve.</p>
<p>Greg</p>
<p>Ps. Damn those Eclipse Gigs <img src='http://blogs.cognifide.com/cleve/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
